Talk:Shuvi Dola/@comment-112.198.75.213-20170925090937/@comment-2A02:C7D:5D61:5200:E10C:1D4E:B536:D90E-20180322181947

On January 6, a user stated that Tet's "Loss" against [  ] was his second and Riku was his first as Coronne made a move for him after his death as to Riku's request.

This is incorrect. The first error is that the [  ] would be Riku in the first place, unnamed at the beginning and you were meant to understand through the story that this unnamed person who Tet "Lost" against was infact Riku himself. This means you should fill in that [  ] gap with Riku's name.

You'd be left with: His loss against [Riku] was his second, his first being against Riku, as he claimed checkmate with the move he asked Coronne to make after his death.

This clearly doesn't make any sense, even you should realise that. So far what we have cleared up is that Riku is the only one he "Lost" against and that there was no second "Loss".

Another mistake is that he never "Lost" against Riku. The move that Couronne made after Riku's death as to his request made the game end in a perpetual check, which just so happens to mean a draw.

Conclusion? Tet has only ever not won a game once. That was when he had a game versus Riku and it ended as a draw.