Talk:Ixseed/@comment-100.36.152.36-20180303072456/@comment-2605:E000:141B:8957:38C1:9621:C84B:5B10-20181210001843

I think the king is perfect for Immanity. While it has the least utility, the rest of its side (the exceed, in this case) would stagnate without it. It's what brings all strategy to its side of the board, and is obviously more important to the game than the queen. However, I think the knight would also be a good fit. All pieces can only move in one direction per turn, with the exception of knights. Knights can threaten any other piece, with that piece being able to use it's mobility to fight back. This is similar to Sora's line "Immanity finds its own way to do things," and Riku's advice to not play your enemies at their own game.

In reality, I'm pretty sure Tet just favors Humans (He says he doesn't, but do you really believe it?), and knew that it would be Immanity that makes the best attempt at beating the game. The king is basically the embodiment of the player in a game of chess.